Get Geoff's telesales tips for inside reps and managers each week. Subscribe by email:

Your email:

Inside Sales Telesales Tips Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Improving telesales performance: why call monitoring isn’t as effective as call coaching

Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Today's post is for managers, but you telesales reps will want to read this, too, because it affects a lot of you directly. It's about a practice common in the inside sales business that is widespread, and not as effective as a lot of managers think it is. It's called call monitoring.

Monitoring is the practice in which inside sales managers, from their own desks, listen to taped or real-time inside sales calls from their reps. In this practice, managers take notes on the call and then later review the call with the rep at some future time. So what's wrong with that? Since the rep cannot immediately achieve success by correcting call issues immediately, effective learning-by-doing doesn't occur. Discussing the call even one hour later isn't very good, because the rep has gone onto other calls, and may not remember what thought processes triggered his or her actions on the call. And "gotcha" moments aren't very much fun for the reps, either.

There is a better way to ensure rep success, and it's called side-by-side coaching. It's done at the rep's desk, in real time. It provides an opportunity for immediate success and enhances team communication, initially between the rep and the manager, and later, through sharing of best practices, throughout the entire inside team as well. In addition, coaching is way more permissible, legally, than monitoring, according to some guidelines cobbled together by the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.

I've long been an advocate of coaching inside sales reps as a more effective alternative to monitoring calls. Let's face it, all reps want to improve their inside sales skills, to accelerate the sales cycle and make more money. That's a real motivator. They want their managers to partner with them to achieve success, but monitoring is often perceived as micro-managing, because it's done from afar, and doesn't allow for the rep to give immediate feedback. As a manager, it's critically important for you to allow the rep to gain a "win" immediately after feedback, and the best way to do it is to coach your reps while they're in the process of making actual calls. That doesn't mean handing them scraps of paper telling them what to say during a call, either. During the call, a good coach sits back, listens, and takes good notes. After the call, you can debrief. And if the rep missed something vital on the call, he or she can call the prospect right back, while you're sitting there, and fix it. After that second call, the rep will have demonstrably shown improvement, and both of you walk away with a win. Not only that, the rep will, in all probability, welcome your presence and opinions at future coaching dates.

How effective is side-by-side coaching? Here's a statistic that's pretty telling: over 130 inside sales reps that have taken my telesales courses have become sales managers or execs, and they did so by learning to think like managers, while they were reps. And many of them tell us that those coaching sessions we conducted served as the template they use today when coaching their own reps. Yes, we do teach managers how to coach in our coaching classes for managers, but for those of you that haven't taken our classes, in next week's post, I'll give you 6 great tips on what you can do to either jump start or improve your own coaching techniques right now.

To sum up: Improving rep performance is an educative process, and giving your reps instant wins is critical to behavioral change. If you're currently monitoring instead of coaching, please reconsider coaching as a faster and more effective way to improve the performance of your inside sales and lead qualification reps. Add side-by-side coaching to your Best Practices playbook.

Comments

Now I have greater insight as to why I respond so negatively to that phrase, "This call may be monitored for evaluation."  
 
 
 
The idea that some supervisor might eavesdrop on my conversation, even if it is in the spirit of performance improvement, never set well with me.  
 
 
 
I hope your recommendation helps enlighten management in all disciplines. One of the first things I learned about performance; you must drive fear out of the organization. And the monitoring style evokes anxiety for everyone.  
 
 
 
One of the best organizations I've seen practice this: Televerde. They conduct several outbound call centers in Phoenix, Arizona. Their performance record, at least in generating results for their technology clients, is extraordinary. And they are strong believers in coaching.  
 
 
 
Posted @ Tuesday, September 08, 2009 8:21 AM by Richard Fouts
Thanks for your comments, Richard. Great teachers (and great managers) don't just "tell," they "show." That's how they become great leaders. The secret sauce isn't just getting people to change behavior, which could be temporary. Instead, it's getting them to want to change, which is a change in mindset that is reinforced by working together with managers that are willing to roll up the shirtsleeves and spend some quality side-by-side time with their reps.
Posted @ Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:12 PM by Geoff Alexander
Monitoring is one useful system that we use along with others. 
 
 
 
One of the most effective in terms of performance and cost is mentoring, where a new staff member (or one undergoing additional training) sits with a more senior staff member of the same telesales project. 
 
 
 
The informal relationship allows the new person to hear how the 'old hand' deals with objections, the tone used, etc, as well as for more direct feedback on their own performance. 
 
 
 
Jonathan 
 
Synergy Connections Ltd - UK Telesales / Telemarketing Services
Posted @ Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:22 AM by Synergy Telesales
What I like about your approach, Jonathan, is that you're not only cross-pollinating best practices, but you're honing supervisory skills on the part of the mentor as well. Good stuff!
Posted @ Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:57 PM by Geoff Alexander
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Have a question for the blog?